SHOULD SEX EDUCATION BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS? --- group discussion
Do’s and Don’ts of
Group Discussion:
(i) Speak on your turn, without being
eager, anxious or interfering when others are speaking.
(ii) Keep eye contact with all other
participants while speaking.
(iii) Initiating the GD is a big advantage. But
keep in mind to initiate the group discussion only
when you understood the GD topic clearly and have some topic knowledge. Speaking without proper subject knowledge
is bad impression. It should be done if an opportunity
to do so arrives, without being dominating. If you are the initiator, assume
all responsibilities that go with
it, the foremost being to ensure that the GD runs smoothly.
(iv) Always speak clearly and confidently. Use
simple and appropriate words while speaking. Don’t
be too aggressive if you disagree with someone. You need not answer others, but
give your opinion on the given topic.
Remember, it is a GD, not a debate.
(v) In case the group is distracting from
the topic or goal then simply take initiative to bring the discussion on the track. Make all group members aware that you
all need to come to some
conclusion at the end of the discussion. So stick to the topic. Digression is
to be avoided.
(vi) Keep positive body language. Show
interest in discussion. Do not look askance when someone is speaking.
(vii) Do not speak just to increase your speaking
time. Don’t worry even if you speak less. Your
thoughts should be sensible and relevant instead of irrelevant speech. But keep
the points ready and in
sequence so that you say all you want to say. Conclude your speech with your view for or against.
(viii) Speak less and listen more! Pay attention
to what others are speaking. This will help you avoid repetition, and make you get involved in the group
positively. You will surely make
people agree with you.
(ix) Some basic subject analysis is sufficient.
There is no need to mention exact figures while giving any reference. Since you have limited time, be precise and
convey your thoughts in short and
simple language.
How to Prepare for
the GD
Since group discussions are knock
out rounds, it is necessary to prepare well which will add to your
self-confidence, but never make the mistake of considering any participant
weak. Some important tips to prepare for GD are given below:
(i) You must endeavour to have a reasonable
knowledge of the major topics of current national
and international interest. For this you need to read regularly standard newspapers and career magazines.
(ii) Acquiring language skills is very
necessary because if you are unable to express what you know, others will not come to know anything about your knowledge.
(iii) Communication skills are the most
important attribute of a manager. These skills include listening and articulation skills. The organizers look for the
candidate’s keenness and ability to
listen to others. Remember, good communication is about speaking a lot, in a stylish accent, or in using bombastic
words. Simple are clear expression is always impressive.
So develop these skills in right earnest.
(iv) You must develop the ability to support
your views with convincing arguments. This skill can be developed by having mock GD sessions with your friends, or by
joining an institute.
(v) There should not be hesitation in
speaking before a number of people. If you are nervous or hesitant you will forget what you know and cut a sorry figure.
Practicing speaking before a mirror
helps.
(vi) Going through a number of GD sessions
mock or real, gives you the experience and confidence
to tackle the GD round.
(vii) Teams skills are very important for the
GD. These include listening to others, being able to handle points of view different from yours, getting across your
point of view without appearing to
be aggressive.
(viii) In case you plan to initiate the GD,
acquire the skill to take the lead if you have a good knowledge of the given topic. Make a note of major points so that
you may conclude at the end.
The GD
The candidates in the present GD are
given Chest Numbers from 1 to 8. They are seated in a semicircle so that they
can observe one another and respond to the views expressed by anyone in the
group. No one addresses the other by name, and each participant is addressed by
his/her Chest Number.
The examiner announces the topic to
the participants: “Should sex education be taught in the schools?” He asks them
to complete the group task within 40 minutes and withdraws from the scene. He
conveniently seats himself away from them but at a place from where he can observe
them and hear them express their views. As soon as the examiner retires from
the hall, there are whispers and cross-talks. Some ask their adjoining
participants, left or right, about the purport of the topic. After a minute or
two, after some whispering and uncertainty as to who will speak first, No.3
takes the lead role and says: “Let us not waste time in side-talks. There is a
time limit and we must get things going.” There was silence as everyone started
looking at him. No.6 who was sitting opposite to No.2 said, “You’re quite
right! And now since you have taken this initiative, you should speak first.”
All others nodded in confirmation.
No.3:
OK guys! I believe that sexual education is very important to learn. Since it
needs to be taught at a young age, schools are the best place to do so. With
the development of society and liberalization under the western thoughts, boys
and girls are coming closer to each other and some may mistakes if they start
having sex, in terms of unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted disease,
including AIDS. For a healthy living young boys and girls need to be taught sex
education in schools.
Comments:
No.3 has shown leadership qualities by initiating the GD. He has expressed his
views clearly and succinctly. He has a good chance to move ahead in the
selection process.
No.7:
According to me, teaching sex education to young boys and girls will only
encourage them to indulge in sex at a tender age and create a lot of problems
for themselves, their parents and society at large. I condemn it.
Comments:
No.7 has been emotional in expressing his views. Instead of weighing the pros
and cons of the situations he has criticized the idea in strong words. This is
not the way to approach a GD. He is likely to be rejected.
No.1:
I am of the opinion that sex education should not be taught in school because teachers
should not be teaching kids about sex in schools. Instead the kids’ parents
should be teaching them about sex and about all of the body parts. It seems
weird for schools to teach little kids about sex where they go to learn other
subjects. Light information about things may be given, but not regular teaching
about sex, for otherwise they may get spoilt and start watching pornography
which is available on the net.
Comments:
No.1 has spoken well giving his views cogently and supporting them with
convincing arguments. He may get a chance to move ahead in the selection
process.
No.6:
Many schools in the West are no longer giving sex-education in schools.
Unfortunately, most parents are uncomfortable to talk to their kids about sex. Hence,
youngsters end up getting incorrect information from the internet. In my
opinion, teenagers must receive proper information about safe sex practices
before they engage in sexual practices.
According to me the only true way to
stop the spread of sexually related diseases and maladies was abstinence until
marriage. Public schools instead try to promote “safe” sex practices, but that
continues to fall in our society. That is why I think sexual education should
not be taught.
Comments:
No.6 has spoken with aplomb, giving convincing arguments. His participation
though short is OK. Much will depend how other participants fare in their turn.
No.5:
I am not ready to accept what is going on in other societies like those of the
west. We are Indians; we are different. We have to do what is good for us. We
are conservative people. We don’t want that our kids should start thinking
about sex instead of concentrating on their studies. Sex related crime is
already on the rise in our country. Sex education will make young boys and
girls more free to indulge in sexual activities. I strongly oppose the view.
That’s all guys!
Comments:
The candidate has painted a negative picture. Instead of weighing the situation
he kept on pressing his one-sided view. The words like “I am not ready to
accept …” should not be used in a GD. Perhaps he lacks experience. He has
little chance of going ahead.
No.2:
To me this is not a topic to be given to prospective managers. What have they
to do with all this stuff of sex education in schools? There are hundreds of
other meaningful topics. I have no opinion on the given topic.
Comments:
The candidate has made the mistake of challenging the efficacy of the
discussion which is quite wrong. Once a topic has been given, the candidates
have to discuss it. He will be rejected outright.
No.4:
It is the parents’ job to teach their child about sex, not schools’. I personally
don’t think the school should get involved in it at all. If children get
involved in a sex scandal the school will earn a bad name. So there is big no
from me.
Comments: The
participation of No.4 is not up to the mark. Instead of saying something new
and useful on the topic in hand, he brings an unimportant point of sex scandal,
which is not likely at school level.
No.8:
School is the place that people go to learn facts, including scientific facts.
Sexual reproduction is also a scientific fact, and there is vital information
about the process that is not necessarily known to all parents. There is no
point in leaving out this system when teaching about the human body. I also
feel that there is no better place to get factual information about the sexual
process than a biology class. If parents want to talk about the moral aspects
of sex with their children, then that is something that should be done outside
the classroom, which will be an additional information, and save our children
from going astray once they have known what sex is all about. Inside the
classroom all facts—no matter how distasteful or embarrassing some people think
they should be discussed. I am sure if we discussed more natural processes in
this way we wouldn’t have so many societal problems.
Most teens know little about sex and
some parents think that it is too touchy of a subject to talk about to their
children. Many teens from grades 9-12 have sex, and half of them do not know anything
about contraceptives or sex in general. What they are taught in sex education
classes will provide them with knowledge that they need to have concerning
sexual intercourse. Because the teen pregnancy is becoming an issue, teens
should have to go through a mandatory sex education classes in high school.
Although students think that they know everything about sex, yet actually they
do not and they need to be taught properly about sex and contraceptives to
prevent pregn2ancy and sexually transmitted diseases.
Comments:
No.8 has presented his views well explaining the importance of sex
education and how parents can impart moral knowledge on their children. His
ideas and confidence were admirable. He will sure go to the next round.
When all the participants had
spoken, No.3 concludes the GD.
Comments:
This GD is now concluded within the allotted time. I thank all the candidates
for their participation. On the basis of views expressed by the participants we
can conclude that sex education is important like education and knowledge about
other scientific facts. Parents can give a knowledge about moral conduct to
their children once they have learnt about sex, which will prevent them from
going astray. Society will be better served with children who have this
knowledge. I once again thank all participants for being part of this GD.
Concluding
Comments: In this GD, No.8 is the best of the lot. He explained why sex
education should be given in schools and how parents can contribute in terms of
imparting knowledge about morals. No.3 who initiated the GD also gave his
opinion clearly and convincingly. They both are selected. No.1 also spoke with
aplomb, but his chances depend on the number of participants who move ahead. If
there is another position he will be taken. Others lack GD skills as well as
knowledge of the topic, and are hence rejected
Post a Comment